Skip to content

Death of the Virgin

February 21, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Death of the Virgin

Caravaggio 1605-1606.

12’ 1 ½” x 8’.

Oil on canvas.

For Sanata Maria della Scala, Trastevere, Rome.  Now in Louvre, Paris.

In 1605, Laerzio Cherubini commissioned Caravaggio to paint an altarpiece for his family’s chapel in the church of Santa Maria della Scala in Trastevere, Rome.  The chapel was dedicated to the Transit of the Virgin.  There was a particular decorum for the depiction of such a scene: the Virgin giving a pious gesture, some sort of ascension of Her soul, and clouds of angels.  Caravaggio disregarded all of these rules and painted a bloated, inappropriately adorned Mary as if she were an ordinary mortal.  For these reasons, the Carmelite clergy of the church rejected it.  From there, it fell into the hands of the duke of Mantua, Charles I of England, a bank collector, Louis XIV, then to the Louvre in 1793 where it is today (Moir 106).

Caravaggio’s dead Virgin offended its viewers.  She appeared very dead, bloated in fact, with so hint of miraculousness about her.  She has no energy whatsoever to raise a hand in gesture.  Her bare feet and ankles are uncovered.  She is in a very poor setting.  Helen Langdon argues that this emphasis on naturalism and poverty was Caravaggio’s way of refuting the Protestant attacks on the cult of the Virgin.  He shows a very human Mary, the poor mother of Christ.  Langdon even suggests the Virgin’s swollen belly represents her miraculous pregnancy (even though she was not pregnant when she died) (248-250). The Virgin’s resemblance Caravaggio’s lover and prostitute, Lena probably distracted contemporary viewers of this painting from understanding the real meaning behind the naturalism (Lena had drowned in a river, so Caravaggio was able to use her dead body as a model).  But it was merely characteristic of Caravaggio to paint from life and to paint incredibly naturalistic figures and situations.

The lack of divinity presented in this composition is also a reason the original patrons rejected it.  This appears to be an ordinary earthly death.  The distinct emotions on every figure’s face add a dynamic quality to the grief portrayed.  However moving it is, this can be any woman’s death.  Vittorio Sgarbi made an interesting point when he explained the copper pot in the foreground of the painting.  In contemporary times, a copper pot was used to wash the corpse.  However, the Virgin Mary is believed to have ascended to Heaven in full body form.  This relates her death to that of any human being.  This could also symbolize distrust in the resurrection, according to Sgarbi, further making this painting unfavorable to the Carmelites (134).

Langdon, Helen.  Caravaggio: A Life. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. 1998.

Moir, Alfred. Caravaggio. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc. 1982.

Sgarbi, Vittorio.  Caravaggio. Milano: Skira Editore S.p.A. 2007.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: